Financial Content | TheState.com
The evidence clearly documents that the Justice Department continued the empirically documented policy of avoiding the public exposure of the Saudi Kingdom involvement in the funding of al Qaeda pre 9/11. The motion documents the Justice Department involvement in criminal contempt of court and obstruction of justice through actions by Assistant Director Michael Kirkpatrick of the FBI in conjunction with United States Senator Lindsey Graham’s offices. These actions occurred even though the patriotic and law abiding Appellants were acting to cut-off al Qaeda funding stemming from the bootlegging of tobacco products. Lawyers from the Justice Department inappropriately invoked the doctrine of National Security, to undermine the proceedings which would have publicly revealed the role of the Saudi Kingdom in the funding of al Qaeda. The Justice Department provided experts with bogus credentials paid for by the United States Government, to testify in a private civil proceeding not involving the U.S. Government which is both unlawful and procedurally against Justice Department oversight policy. These wrongful actions are consistent with the United States Government’s withholding of the 28 pages from the 9/11 report from the American public that identifies funders of 9/11 under the doctrine of National Security.
The newly discovered evidence was received from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (“SLED”) on July 17, 2015 in response to a FOIA submitted on June 18, 2015. A key document that leaked out had been one of many documents believed to be in existence which had legally been sought by the Appellants for over eleven years. The document describes the Justice Department and SLED’s role in the violation of various court orders that constituted obstruction of justice and criminal contempt of court. The action of the Justice Department and SLED completely undermined the Southern Holdings case which ended before trial by the Federal Judge imposing a settlement without the requisite Appellants’ written permission of informed consent.
The motion clearly evidences the role of the FBI, the Justice Department and SLED in the destruction of key evidence (e.g. FBI-NCIC reports, records, FBI laboratory manuals, videotapes, dispatch recordings) and the FBI’s complete failure to initiate non-discretionary investigations into civil rights violations under color of law with brutality by bribed law enforcement personnel. Furthermore, the Justice Department participated in the fabrication of evidence (e.g. FBI Chain of Custody, laboratory reports, subornation of perjury) and now denies any knowledge of the civil rights violations ever being reported to the FBI. These actions led to the inability on the part of the Appellants to receive a fair trial and is consistent with the Justice Department’s goal of concealing the Saudi Kingdoms involvement in funding al Qaeda pre 9/11.
Link to Filings in 4th Circuit Federal District Court: http://tinyurl.com/pwzgp3q
Original Source: Saudi Arabia’s 9/11 Funding Case Now Before the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals